Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 147 Results
Showing 147 Results
Management | Miscellaneous
2022

Distilling evaluation practice into 43 essential tasks

This poster summarizing results from a research study conducted by EvaluATE on evaluation tasks was presented at the 2022 American Evaluation Association conference. 

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results | Miscellaneous
2022

Get the word out: Translating findings from research on evaluation

This poster about dissemination strategies for research on evaluation was presented at AEA 2022.

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results | Video
2022

Get the word out: Sharing your innovative practices, resources, and findings

This short video created in 2022 gives an overview of how to use the Dissemination Matrix to strategically identify platforms to share your work.

Data Collection & Analysis | Video
2022

Sentiment Analysis Methodology

This 2022 video series provides an introduction to the method of sentiment analysis for analyzing themes in qualitative data.

Data Collection & Analysis, Planning and Design | Guide
2023

Guide to Measuring DEI in ATE Projects

This quick reference guide was developed from Drs. Boyce and Tovey's 2021 webinar on measuring diversity, equity, and inclusion in ATE projects.

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Data Collection & Analysis, Engagement, Interpretation, Management, Planning and Design, Quality Review | Slides
2023

Distilling Evaluation Practice into 43 Essential Tasks

None | Toolkit
2023

Essential Pre-Award Steps for ATE Evaluation

The resources in this toolkit are intended to assist those applying to the NSF ATE program. The suggested steps can guide grant seekers and grant professionals through the process of identifying an independent evaluator and developing an evaluation plan.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.