Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 147 Results
Showing 147 Results
None | Miscellaneous
2010

Advanced Technological Education Program Evaluation Project Implementation: Challenges and Resolutions

This brief examines the major challenges and resolutions associated with ATE project implementation, as reported by project and center principal investigators (PIs)....

None | Miscellaneous
2010

Materials Development, Professional Development, and Program Improvement

None | Miscellaneous
2008

Doc: ATE Professional Development Evaluation

These are the handouts from Arlen Gullickson and Lori Wingate’s presentation at the 2008 Advanced Technological Education Principal Investigators Conference, including the...

None | Miscellaneous
1999

Evaluation Contracts Checklist

This checklist designed to help evaluators and clients to identify key contractual issues and make and record their agreements for conducting an...

None | Miscellaneous
2001

Recruitment and Retention in the ATE program

This report describes findings from current literature that helped our understanding of the general background issues surrounding recruitment and retention as well...

None | Miscellaneous
2002

Guide for Improving Sustainability

Guide for improving sustainability

None | Miscellaneous
2004

Rubrics for Assessing the Quality of ATE Developed Materials

Rubric for assessing the quality of materials developed by ATE

None | Miscellaneous
2008

Facilitating an Understanding of Advanced Technological Education Targeted Research Needs

Facilitating an understanding of ATE targeted research needs

None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: 2011 ATE PI Workshop

The 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop featured 2 rounds of small group discussions, one centered around evaluation contexts, and one centered...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.