Showing 1-8 of 585 Results
Sort By

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 6: Using Your Evaluation Results
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 5: Reporting
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 4: Data Analysis and Interpretation
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 3: Data Collection Plan
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Reflecting on the 2023 ATE Evaluation Summit: Advancing Evaluation Practices in the ATE Program
2023

Evaluation plays a crucial role in assessing the effectiveness and impact of programs. In the realm of Advanced Technological Education (ATE), where...

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 2: Evaluation Focus
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Strategies and Insights into Evaluation Plans for NSF ATE Proposals
2023

Evaluation is an essential part of a successful grant proposal, particularly in the NSF Advanced Technological Education program. In this webinar, attendees...

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 1: The Evaluator
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.