Showing 49-56 of 70 Results
Sort By

Strategic Knowledge Mapping: A New Tool for Visualizing and Using Evaluation Findings in STEM
2016

A challenge to designing effective STEM programs is that they address very large, complex goals, such as increasing the numbers of underrepresented...

Improving Evaluator Communication and PI Evaluation Understanding to Increase Evaluation Use: The Evaluator’s Perspective
2015

As a project PI, have you ever glanced at an evaluation report and wished it has been presented in a different format...

Improving Evaluator Communication and PI Evaluation Understanding to Increase Evaluation Use: The Principal Investigator’s Perspective
2015

As an evaluator, have you ever spent hours working on an evaluation report only to find that your client skimmed it or...

Quick Graphics with Canva
2015

In your ATE project, you often have to develop different communication materials for your stakeholders.  To make them more interesting, and move...

Identifying Your NSF Project’s Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Template
2015

This 2015 template is intended to help project leaders and evaluators identify evidence of intellectual merit and broader impacts within their project.

Results from Prior NSF Support Checklist
2015

This 2015 checklist summarizes elements that one should include when writing results from prior NSF support in an NSF proposal.

Developing a Theory of Change for Your Innovation Project
2015

Have you ever had to express a theory of change to convince funders that there’s a logical argument behind your innovation? Funders...

Webinar Coordination Checklist
2015

This 2015 checklist is designed to help anyone plan and host a successful webinar based on best practices and lessons learned producing some 30+ EvaluATE webinars.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.