Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 654 Results
Showing 654 Results
None | Newsletter
2016

2016 Summer

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Chris Carter, Lori Wingate

None | Newsletter
2016

Communicating Results from Prior NSF Support

ATE proposal season is many months away in early October, but if you are submitting for new funding this year, now is...

None | Newsletter
2016

Survey Says Winter 2016

On the 2015 ATE survey, 65 of 230 principal investigators (28%) reported spending some portion of their annual budgets on research. Six...

None | Newsletter
2016

2016 Spring

This is the pdf version of our Spring 2016 Newsletter. This issue is focused on evaluation use. File: Click Here Type: Newsletter...

Management, Planning and Design | Blog Post
2024

Steps for Communicating Evaluation Design to PIs

As ATE evaluators, our team engages with many new ATE PIs. To equip new clients for success, we initiate a prescriptive process...

None | Newsletter
2015

How Do You Know if Your Program is Meeting Industry Needs?

Since the core of the ATE program is to prepare a technical workforce, it is critical to match the skills that students...

None | Newsletter
2016

Where and how should I report on my evaluation in my annual report to the National Science Foundation?

Research.gov is the online reporting system used by all National Science Foundation grantees. The system is designed to accommodate reporting on all...

Data Collection & Analysis, Management | Video
2019

Evaluation in Your ATE Proposal Video 4: Evaluation Data

This is video 4 of 6 in our Evaluation in Your ATE Proposal Series. This video talks about evaluation data, specifically what data will be collected, how it will be analyzed, and how the data will be interpreted.

None | Newsletter
2009

2009 Spring

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Lindsay Noakes, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.