Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 649 Results
Showing 649 Results
None | Newsletter
2016

How can PIs demonstrate that their projects have “advanced knowledge”?

NSF’s Intellectual Merit criterion is about advancing knowledge and understanding within a given field or across fields. Publication in peer-reviewed journals provides...

None | Newsletter
2009

2010 Winter

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Elaine Craft, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results | Template
2015

Identifying Your NSF Project’s Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Template

This template is intended to help project leaders and evaluators identify evidence of intellectual merit and broader impacts within their project.

None | Newsletter
2009

2009 Fall

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Joellen Killion, Lori Wingate, Peggie Weeks, Stephanie Evergreen

None | Newsletter
2015

Survey Says

Each year, ATE PIs are asked what type of reports their evaluators provide them with and how they use the information. The...

None | Newsletter
2015

Dashboards

Dashboards are a way to present data about the “trends of an organization’s key performance indicators.”1 Dashboards are designed to provide information...

None | Newsletter
2013

ATE Sustainability

Sustainability is about ensuring that at least some aspects of a project or center’s work—such as faculty positions, partnerships, or curricula—have “a...

None | Newsletter
2015

Collaborative Evaluation

A collaborative evaluation is one “in which there is a significant degree of collaboration or cooperation between evaluators and stakeholders in planning...

Management, Planning and Design | Webinar
2023

Evaluation Essentials for Non-Evaluators

Submitting a proposal to the NSF ATE program can be overwhelming. One of the many proposal requirements is around evaluating your project...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.