None | Newsletter
2014
Frequency of PI-Evaluator Interactions
According to the ATE Survey 2014, most project and center PIs meet with their evaluators occasionally or often. A striking difference between...
Showing 654 Results
None | Newsletter
2016
How can PIs demonstrate that their projects have “advanced knowledge”?
NSF’s Intellectual Merit criterion is about advancing knowledge and understanding within a given field or across fields. Publication in peer-reviewed journals provides...
Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results | Template
2015
Identifying Your NSF Project’s Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts Template
This template is intended to help project leaders and evaluators identify evidence of intellectual merit and broader impacts within their project.
None | Newsletter
2009
2010 Winter
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Elaine Craft, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen
None | Newsletter
2009
2009 Fall
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Joellen Killion, Lori Wingate, Peggie Weeks, Stephanie Evergreen
None | Newsletter
2015
Survey Says
Each year, ATE PIs are asked what type of reports their evaluators provide them with and how they use the information. The...
None | Newsletter
2013
ATE Sustainability
Sustainability is about ensuring that at least some aspects of a project or center’s work—such as faculty positions, partnerships, or curricula—have “a...
None | Newsletter
2015
Dashboards
Dashboards are a way to present data about the “trends of an organization’s key performance indicators.”1 Dashboards are designed to provide information...
Management, Planning and Design | Slides
2015
HI-TEC 2015 – Evaluation: Don’t Submit Your ATE Proposal Without It
A strong evaluation plan that is well integrated into your grant proposal will strengthen your submission and maybe even give you a competitive edge. In this session we’ll provide insights on ways to enhance your proposal and avoid common pitfalls with regard to evaluation.
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.