None | Newsletter
2014
Formative Evaluation
The most common purposes, or intended uses of evaluations, are often described by the terms formative evaluation and summative evaluation. Formative evaluation...
Showing 654 Results
None | Newsletter
2015
Secondary Data Resources
It’s easier than ever to access national-level data that may be useful to ATE projects and centers for planning, benchmarking, or evaluation....
None | Newsletter
2008
2008 Fall
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Arlen Gullickson, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen
None | Newsletter
2015
Project Spotlight: E-MATE
A conversation with Mike Qaissaunee, E-MATE’s principal investigator Q: How did you work with your evaluator during proposal development? A: As PI...
Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results | Checklist
2015
Webinar Coordination Checklist
This checklist is designed to help anyone plan and host a successful webinar based on best practices and lessons learned producing some 30+ EvaluATE webinars.
None | Newsletter
2015
Project Spotlight: MatEdu
Mel Cossette is principal investigator for the National Resource Center for Materials Technology Education at Edmonds Community College. MatEdU’s mission is to...
None | Newsletter
2016
Outcomes and Impacts
Outcomes are “changes or benefits resulting from activities and outputs,” including changes in knowledge, attitude, skill, behavior, practices, policies, and conditions. These...
None | Newsletter
2010
2010 Spring
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Amy Germuth, Lori Wingate, Peggie Weeks, Stephanie Evergreen
Planning and Design | Checklist
2014
Overview of the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
This is a graphic overview of the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development created in 2014.
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.