Management, Planning and Design | Guide
2018
Evaluation Process Visual
This 2018 guide provides an overview of the four-step evaluation process.
Showing 161 Results
Planning and Design | Webinar
2018
Evaluation Basics for Non-evaluators
In this webinar, we’ll answer these and other common questions about program evaluation.
Data Collection & Analysis, Management, Planning and Design | Blog Post
2018
Part 2: Using Embedded Assessment to Understand Science Skills
In our last EvaluATE blog, we defined embedded assessments (EAs) and described the benefits and challenges of using EAs to measure and...
Planning and Design | Webinar
2017
Evaluation: All the Funded ATE Proposals Are Doing It
This webinar will review the key elements of a winning evaluation plan and strategies for demonstrating to reviewers that evaluation is an integral part of your project, not an afterthought.
Interpretation, Management, Planning and Design | Blog Post
2017
Integrating Perspectives for a Quality Evaluation Design
Designing a rigorous and informative evaluation depends on communication with program staff to understand planned activities and how those activities relate to...
Management, Planning and Design | Template
2017
ATE Proposal Evaluation Plan Template
This template is for use in preparing the evaluation plan sections for proposals to the National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program.
Planning and Design | Blog Post
2017
Evaluator, Researcher, Both?
Having served as a project evaluator and as a project researcher, it is apparent to me how critical it is to have...
Planning and Design | Blog Post
2017
Logic Models for Curriculum Evaluation
At the STEM Program at WestEd, we are in the third year of an evaluation of an innovative, hands-on STEM curriculum. Learning...
Data Collection & Analysis, Planning and Design | Blog Post
2017
Evaluating New Technology
As a STEM practitioner and evaluator, I have had many opportunities to assess new and existing courses, workshops, and programs. But there...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.