Showing 17-24 of 112 Results
Sort By

How to Avoid Common Pitfalls When Writing Evaluation Plans for ATE Proposals

Join this webinar to learn what pitfalls to watch out for when writing evaluation plans for grant proposals! In this webinar, we...

10 Helpful Hints and 10 Fatal Flaws: Writing Better Evaluation Sections in Your Proposals

This 2020 guide identified 10 helpful hints and 10 fatal flaws to apply when writing evaluation sections in your project proposals.

Collection of Quick Reference Guides

This collection includes over 50 evaluation quick reference guides that address evaluation planning, to data collection, to reporting. Quick reference guides are practical reference or resource materials such as checklists, worksheets, templates, info-graphics, cheat sheets, or even a table or page in a book

Impact Evaluation: Why, What, and How

This webinar is an introduction to impact evaluation and how it can be realistically implemented in ATE projects.

Evaluating Professional Development Projects*

A good prompt to start thinking about how to approach the evaluation of an Advanced Technological Education (ATE) professional development (PD) project...

Kirkpatrick Model for ATE Evaluation

The Kirkpatrick Model is an evaluation framework organized around four levels of impact: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. It was developed more...

What Grant Writers Need to Know About Evaluation

Fellow grant writers: Do you ever stop and ask yourselves, “Why do we write grants?” Do you actually enjoy herding cats, pulling...

11 Important Things to Know About Evaluating Curriculum Development Projects*

Curriculum development projects are designed to create new content or present content to students in a new format with new activities or...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.