The Formative Assessment Systems for ATE project (FAS4ATE) focuses on assessment practices that serve the ongoing evaluation needs of projects and centers....
Working with underage students bears an increased responsibility for their supervision. Concerns may arise during the implementation of activities that were never...
As dean of institutional effectiveness and grants I have varied responsibilities, but at heart, I am a grant writer. I find it...
Survey developers typically spend a great deal of time on the content of questionnaires. We struggle with what items to include, how...
All ATE proposals, except for planning grants, are required to specify a budget line for an independent evaluator. But the solicitation offers...
This 2015 document includes a series of six checklists—one for each of the six types of research outlined in the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.
Evaluators that are working in education contexts are often required to use externally created criteria and standards, such as GPA targets, graduation...
This document presents a framework for evaluating design and development research. It was created by Hezel and Associates, and incorporates the NSF Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.
How can ATE project staff and/or STEM educators in general tell if the strategies they are implementing to increase diversity are impacting...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.