ATE Small Project Evaluation
2015
All ATE proposals, except for planning grants, are required to specify a budget line for an independent evaluator. But the solicitation offers...
ATE Small Project Evaluation
Checklist for the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
2015
This 2015 document includes a series of six checklists—one for each of the six types of research outlined in the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.
Indicators and the Difficulty With Them
2015
Evaluators that are working in education contexts are often required to use externally created criteria and standards, such as GPA targets, graduation...
Evaluation of NSF ATE Program Research and Development
2015
This document presents a framework for evaluating design and development research. It was created by Hezel and Associates, and incorporates the NSF Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.
Gender Evaluation Strategies: Improving Female Recruitment and Retention in ATE Projects
2015
How can ATE project staff and/or STEM educators in general tell if the strategies they are implementing to increase diversity are impacting...
Evaluating ATE Efforts Using Peer-Generated Surveys
2014
During the course of evaluating the sustainability of NSF’s Advanced Technological Education program, I introduced a new method for creating evaluation surveys....
Evaluating Impact: How I Moved From Pipeline to Interstate
2014
John Sener of Sener Knowledge LLC, an external evaluator for over a dozen ATE and other NSF grants over the past eight...
Overview of the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
2014
This is a graphic overview of the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development created in 2014.
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.