Showing 129-136 of 154 Results
Sort By

Evaluation Plan Development for Grant Writing
2015

As dean of institutional effectiveness and grants I have varied responsibilities, but at heart, I am a grant writer. I find it...

A Rose Isn’t as Sweet by Any Other Name: Lessons on Subject Lines for Web Surveys
2015

Survey developers typically spend a great deal of time on the content of questionnaires. We struggle with what items to include, how...

ATE Small Project Evaluation
2015

All ATE proposals, except for planning grants, are required to specify a budget line for an independent evaluator. But the solicitation offers...

Checklist for the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
2015

This 2015 document includes a series of six checklists—one for each of the six types of research outlined in the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.

Indicators and the Difficulty With Them
2015

Evaluators that are working in education contexts are often required to use externally created criteria and standards, such as GPA targets, graduation...

Evaluation of NSF ATE Program Research and Development
2015

This document presents a framework for evaluating design and development research. It was created by Hezel and Associates, and incorporates the NSF Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development.

Gender Evaluation Strategies: Improving Female Recruitment and Retention in ATE Projects
2015

How can ATE project staff and/or STEM educators in general tell if the strategies they are  implementing to increase diversity are impacting...

Evaluating ATE Efforts Using Peer-Generated Surveys
2014

During the course of evaluating the sustainability of NSF’s Advanced Technological Education program, I introduced a new method for creating evaluation surveys....

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.