Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 641 Results
Showing 641 Results
None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: Evaluation Challenge: Reporting and Dissemination

This is Candiya Mann’s evaluation challenge handout from the 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop.

None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: Evaluation Context: Curriculum Development Projects

This is Karl Kapp’s evaluation context handout from the 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop.

None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: Evaluation Challenge: Obtaining Data from Individuals

This is Karl Kapp’s handout on evaluation challenges from the 2100 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop

None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: Evaluation Context: Professional Development Projects

Terryll Bailey’s handout on evaluation contexts from the 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop

None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: 2011 ATE PI Workshop

The 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop featured 2 rounds of small group discussions, one centered around evaluation contexts, and one centered...

Management | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: Five levels of Professional Development Evaluation

A handout on the five levels of professional development evaluation, presented at the 2011 ATE PI conference.

None | Miscellaneous
2011

Doc: Evaluation Challenge: Using findings to make decisions

Terryll Bailey’s evaluation challenge handout from the 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop

Data Collection & Analysis | Guide
2011

ATE Google Analytics for Evaluation: Handbook & Benchmarks

This 2011 guide provides an overview of using Google Analytics for ATE evaluations, including results of a benchmarking study.

None | Miscellaneous
2011

The Impact of the Advanced Technological Education Program

Research report on the impact of the ATE program

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.