Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 2: Evaluation Focus
2023
EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....
Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 2: Evaluation Focus
Strategies and Insights into Evaluation Plans for NSF ATE Proposals
2023
Evaluation is an essential part of a successful grant proposal, particularly in the NSF Advanced Technological Education program. In this webinar, attendees...
Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 1: The Evaluator
2023
EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....
Essential Pre-Award Steps for ATE Evaluation
2023
The resources in this toolkit are intended to assist those applying to the NSF ATE program. The suggested steps can guide grant seekers and grant professionals through the process of identifying an independent evaluator and developing an evaluation plan.
Evaluation Plan Checklist for ATE Proposals
2023
This 2023 checklist provides information on what should be included in evaluation plans for proposals to the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program.
How ATE Proposal Evaluation Plans Have Changed Over Time: 2004–2017
2023
EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group examined the evaluation plan sections of 169 randomly selected ATE proposals funded between 2004 and...
Evaluation Essentials for Non-Evaluators: Understanding the Basics and Benefits of Evaluation
2023
Submitting a proposal to the National Science Foundation Advanced Technical Education (ATE) program can be overwhelming. One of the many proposal requirements...
The State of Evaluation in the ATE Program 2023
2023
This 2023 report provides a snapshot of practices and perceptions in ATE evaluation. The report was created to ground conversations during the...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.