A strong evaluation plan that is well integrated into your grant proposal will strengthen your submission and maybe even give you a competitive edge. In this session we’ll provide insights on ways to enhance your proposal and avoid common pitfalls with regard to evaluation.
This 2017 blog and graphic from Stephanie Wilkerson at Magnolia Consulting provides guidance on creating an infographic. It provides a structure for...
NSF identifies five questions that proposal reviewers should consider in relation to the NSF merit criteria of Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.1...
This 2022 webinar handout lists 16 tools and methods that meet the unique demands of evaluation, along with resources to learn more about each.
As ATE evaluators, our team engages with many new ATE PIs. To equip new clients for success, we initiate a prescriptive process...
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Amy Gullickson, Elizabeth Teles, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen
This worksheet can help the user to identify important information that will satisfy claims they make about their program.
If you have ever written a proposal to the National Science Foundation (NSF) or participated in a proposal review panel for NSF,...
ATE principal investigators (PIs) who received both oral and written reports from their evaluators indicated more use of their evaluation results than...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.