Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 654 Results
Showing 654 Results
None | Newsletter
2013

What grant writers need to know about evaluation

Fellow grant writers: Do you ever stop and ask yourselves, “Why do we write grants?” Do you actually enjoy herding cats, pulling...

None | Newsletter
2016

Getting the Most out of Your Logic Model

I recently led two workshops at the American Evaluation Association’s Summer Evaluation Institute. To get a sense of the types of projects...

None | Newsletter
2014

The Power of Evaluator and PI Collaboration

The PI of an ATE center or project has the responsibility of keeping a strong communication flow with the evaluator. This begins even...

None | Blog Post
2016

National Science Foundation-funded Resources to Support Your Advanced Technological Education (ATE) Project

Did you know that other National Science Foundation programs focused on STEM education have centers that provide services to projects? EvaluATE offers...

None | Newsletter
2013

Evaluation Planning Checklist for ATE Proposals

and other resources to assist in proposal development and evaluation planning To assist ATE proposers navigate the intersection of proposal development and...

Data Collection & Analysis | Blog Post
2017

Using Mutual Interviewing to Gather Student Feedback

It’s hard to do a focus group with 12 or more students! With so many people and so little time, you know...

Management | Guide
2018

External Evaluator Timeline Example

This 2018 guide is an example of a visual timeline of evaluation activities across three years of a grant.

Management, Planning and Design | Slides
2021

Stories are Data Slides

Slides from ATE PI 2021 Pre-conference Workshop

None | Newsletter
2014

From ANCOVA to Z Scores

The Evaluation Glossary App features more than 600 terms related to evaluation and assessment. Designed for both evaluators and those who work with evaluators, the app...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.