Filter By
Sort By
Showing 669 Results
Showing 669 Results
Management, Planning and Design | Checklist
2022

ATE PI Checklist for Getting Started with Your Evaluation Post-Award

This 2022 checklist is for PIs and co-PIs who are getting started with their evaluation after being funded.

Planning and Design | Webinar
2022

Beyond Research: Practical Tools for Your Evaluation Toolbox

Evaluation and research have a lot in common. But there are also important differences. Evaluation has a unique purpose, along with distinct...

Engagement | Blog Post
2022

ATE Evaluation Judges Advise Alignment

In 2021, EvaluATE started the Outstanding ATE Evaluation Award program. Three exceptional STEM education evaluators served as judges: Cherie Avent, Cynthia Phillips,...

Engagement | Blog Post
2022

Platinum Programs Are Agile

I am standing in the flooring section of one of those big box home improvement centers, looking at flooring and puzzling over...

Planning and Design | Slides
2022

Integrating Evaluation into Your ATE Proposal

This slide deck is from a presentation at the High Impact Technology Conference in 2022. Aimed at project staff, it provides an...

Management | Slides
2022

Help! How do I find an external evaluator?

This slide deck is from a presentation at the High Impact Technology Conference in 2022. Aimed at project staff, it provides an...

Management | Guide
2022

Getting to Know an Evaluator: What Should I Ask?

This guide suggests questions for project staff to ask when interviewing evaluators. Project staff need to ensure that an evaluator has the...

Planning and Design | Guide
2022

Essential ATE Evaluation Tasks

This document identifies and defines the essential tasks involved in planning and conducting an evaluation of a National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Advanced Technological Education (ATE) project. ... The tasks convey what needs to be done in evaluation and, in most cases, why. They do not include details about how the work should be done.

National Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.