None | Newsletter
2011
2011 Fall
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Amy Gullickson, John Kmiec, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen
Showing 654 Results
None | Newsletter
2011
2011 Spring
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Amy Gullickson, Helen Sullivan, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen, Wayne Welch
None | Newsletter
2012
2012 Summer
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Lori Wingate, Michael Lesiecki
None | Newsletter
2016
2016 Winter
This is the pdf version of our Winter 2016 Newsletter. This issue is focused on proposal development. File: Click Here Type: Newsletter...
Data Collection & Analysis, Management | Video
2019
Evaluation in Your ATE Proposal Video 5: Evaluation Communication, Use, and Timelines
This is video 5 of 6 in our Evaluation in Your ATE Proposal Series. This video covers communication with your evaluator, evaluation use, and evaluation timelines.
None | Newsletter
2016
Bridging the Gap: Using Action Plans to Facilitate Evaluation Use
NSF requires evaluation, in part, because it is an essential tool for project improvement. Yet all too often, evaluation results are not...
None | Newsletter
2015
2015 Spring
This is the pdf version of our Spring 2015 Newsletter File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Celeste Carter, Corey...
Management | Video
2019
Evaluation in Your ATE Proposal Video 2: Evaluation Plan and Identifying an Evaluator
This is video 2 of 6 in our Evaluation in Your ATE Proposal Series. This video reviews what counts as an external evaluator and how to find a qualified evaluator.
None | Newsletter
2015
Survey Says Fall 2015
The ATE program supported nearly 1,300 programs at 2-year colleges and secondary schools across the country in 2014. The full report of...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.