Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 620 Results
Showing 620 Results
Engagement | Template
2014

Identifying and Involving Stakeholders in an Evaluation

This worksheet guides the identification and involvement of evaluation stakeholders in your project.

None | Newsletter
2014

Everyday Evaluation

At EvaluATE, evaluation is a shared responsibility. We have a wonderful external evaluator, Dr. Lana Rucks, with whom we meet a few...

None | Newsletter
2014

Beyond Reporting: Getting More Value Out of Your Evaluation

All ATE projects are required to have an evaluation of their work and it is expected that results will be included in...

None | Newsletter
2014

Critical Friend

The term critical friend describes a stance an evaluator can take in his or her relationship with the program or project they...

None | Newsletter
2014

What is the best way to coordinate internal and external evaluation?

All ATE projects are required to allocate funds for external evaluation services. So, when it comes to internal and external evaluation, the...

None | Newsletter
2014

Using Evaluation Results to Guide Decision Making

As a PI for an ATE project or center, it is clear that working with evaluators provides key information for the success...

None | Newsletter
2014

Frequency of PI-Evaluator Interactions

According to the ATE Survey 2014, most project and center PIs meet with their evaluators occasionally or often. A striking difference between...

None | Newsletter
2014

2014 Fall

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Corey Smith, Elaine Johnson, Jason Burkhardt, Lori Wingate

None | Blog Post
2014

Welcome to the EvaluATE Blog!

The EvaluATE blog is a way for you, the ATE community members, to share your knowledge and experience, particularly as it relates...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.