Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 617 Results
Showing 617 Results
Planning and Design | Webinar
2009

Developing Strong Evaluations for ATE Projects

This webinar workshop is oriented toward those preparing ATE proposals and seeking assistance in integrating evaluation into project work. The two-part workshop...

None | Newsletter
2009

2009 Summer

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Gloria Rogers, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen

None | Newsletter
2009

2009 Spring

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Lindsay Noakes, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen

None | Newsletter
2008

2009 Winter

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen, Stephen Jurs

None | Miscellaneous
2008

Doc: ATE Professional Development Evaluation

These are the handouts from Arlen Gullickson and Lori Wingate’s presentation at the 2008 Advanced Technological Education Principal Investigators Conference, including the...

None | Miscellaneous
2008

Facilitating an Understanding of Advanced Technological Education Targeted Research Needs

Facilitating an understanding of ATE targeted research needs File: Click Here

None | Newsletter
2008

2008 Fall

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Arlen Gullickson, Lori Wingate, Stephanie Evergreen

Planning and Design | External Resource
2007

Evaluation Questions Checklist for Program Evaluation

Evaluation questions identify what aspects of a program will be investigated. They focus on the merit, worth, or significance of a program or particular aspects of a program. Unlike survey questions, they are not intended to derive single data points. Evaluation questions help to define the boundaries of an evaluation that are consistent with evaluation users’ information needs, opportunities, and constraints related to data collection, and available resources.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.