Management, Planning and Design | Guide
2018
Evaluation Process Visual
This 2018 guide provides an overview of the four-step evaluation process.
Showing 649 Results
Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Interpretation | Blog Post
2017
Evaluation’s Role in Helping Clients Avoid GroupThink
In December of 2016, I presented a poster on a STEM-C education project at the Restore America’s Estuaries National Summit, co-hosted by...
Management | Blog Post
2019
5 Tips for Evaluating Multisite Projects*
Conducting evaluations for multisite projects can present unique challenges and opportunities. For example, evaluators must be careful to ensure that consistent data...
Engagement, Management | Blog Post
2016
Best Practices for Two-Year Colleges to Create Competitive Evaluation Plans
Northeast Wisconsin Technical College’s (NWTC) Grants Office works closely with its Institutional Research Office to create ad hoc evaluation teams in order...
Data Collection & Analysis | Blog Post
2015
Crowdsourcing Interview Data Analysis
Most of the evaluations I conduct include interview or focus group data. This data provides a sense of student experiences and outcomes...
Interpretation | Blog Post
2020
Understanding Data Literacy
In today’s data-filled society, institutions are abundant with data but lack data literacy, the ability to transform data into usable information and...
Engagement, Management | Guide
2018
Evaluation Responsibility Diagram
This 2018 guide provides an overview of evaluation responsibilities for the project staff, external evaluator, and combined responsibilities.
Quality Review | Webinar
2010
Workforce Needs Assessment
What if you reached the end of your project, which experienced great successes, but the industry employers in your region said your...
None | Blog Post
2015
Evidence and Evaluation in STEM Education: The Federal Perspective
If you have been awarded federal grants over many years, you probably have seen the increasing emphasis on evaluation and evidence. As...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.