Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 116 Results
Showing 116 Results
None | Newsletter
2013

ATE Sustainability

Sustainability is about ensuring that at least some aspects of a project or center’s work—such as faculty positions, partnerships, or curricula—have “a...

None | Newsletter
2013

Do you have a model for writing up survey results?

There is not a one-size-fits-all template for writing up survey results—it depends in the survey’s scale, the reason it was conducted, and...

None | Newsletter
2013

The ATE Survey: Telling the ATE Story Since 2000

For the past 14 of the ATE program’s 20 years, an annual survey has documented the activities and accomplishments of ATE projects...

None | Newsletter
2013

Developing a Culture of Evaluation

As an ATE project, you and your team collect a lot of data: You complete the annual monitoring survey, you work with...

None | Newsletter
2013

2013 Fall

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Corey Smith, Gerhard Salinger, Leslie Goodyear, Lori Wingate

None | Newsletter
2013

What grant writers need to know about evaluation

Fellow grant writers: Do you ever stop and ask yourselves, “Why do we write grants?” Do you actually enjoy herding cats, pulling...

None | Newsletter
2013

Data Management Plan (DMP)

DMPs are not evaluation plans, but they should address how evaluation data will be handled and possibly shared. DMPs are required for...

None | Newsletter
2013

Evaluator Qualifications: Which is more important- evaluation or subject matter expertise?

When shopping for an external evaluator, a common question is whether it is better to hire someone who really understands your project’s...

None | Newsletter
2013

Evaluation Planning Checklist for ATE Proposals

and other resources to assist in proposal development and evaluation planning To assist ATE proposers navigate the intersection of proposal development and...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.