Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 250 Results
Showing 250 Results
Data Collection & Analysis | Blog Post
2026

Using Standards in Evaluation

In my area of work, educational evaluation, standards refer to desired behaviors, skills, or measurable knowledge. I like standards. If I disagree...

Planning and Design | Blog Post
2026

Building a Strong ATE Evaluation Plan

At Pacific Research and Evaluation, a key strategy to ensure a successful ATE evaluation throughout the life of the grant is to...

Planning and Design | Blog Post
2026

Leading Logic Model Development Sessions

A logic model is a visual tool that shows how a program is designed to work, outlining the relationships among resources, activities,...

Planning and Design | Blog Post
2026

Can “Peopling Skills” Help Manage Evaluation Scope Creep?

Let’s revisit evaluation scope creep – meaning a project growing out of the evaluator’s control. This post expands on a 2019 EvaluATE...

Data Collection & Analysis | Blog Post
2026

Enhancing Survey Accessibility: Lessons from the NSF ATE RECITE Project

As evaluators of federally funded projects, we know that ensuring broad participation in research and evaluation is essential for capturing diverse perspectives...

None | Blog Post
2025

Meet an Evaluator: David McCarty-Caplan

Q: In your view, what makes a successful evaluation? A: A successful evaluation centers the lived realities of participants, fosters organizational learning,...

None | Blog Post
2025

Meet an Evaluator: Q&A with Louis McIntyre

Q: In your view, what makes a successful evaluation? A: A successful project evaluation is a structured, fact-based review that measures how...

None | Blog Post
2025

Meet an Evaluator: Q&A with J.R. Moller

Q: In your view, what makes a successful evaluation? A: I believe a successful evaluation helps deepen programmatic learning. It also aids...

None | Blog Post
2025

Meet an Evaluator: Q&A with Pamela Leggett-Robinson

Q: What evaluation approaches inform your practice? Do you gravitate more toward quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods? My evaluation practice is informed...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.