Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 649 Results
Showing 649 Results
None | Newsletter
2014

The PI Guide to Working with Evaluators

(originally published as blog at ltd.edc.org/strong-pievaluator-partnerships-users-guide on January 10, 2013) Evaluation can be a daunting task for PIs. It can seem like the...

None | Newsletter
2013

2014 Winter

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Corey Smith, Gordon Snyder, Jane Ostrander, Jason Burkhardt, Leslie Goodyear, Lori Wingate, Marilyn...

Management | Webinar
2013

Questions, Data, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Connecting the Dots for an Effective Evaluation

This webinar is intended for evaluators who are launching new evaluations or seeking to strengthen the overall design of ongoing studies.  We’ll...

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Interpretation | Slides
2013

ATE PI 2013- PreConference: Strategies for Meaningful Interpretation of ATE Evaluation Data

None | Newsletter
2013

20 Years of ATE Evaluation

Evaluation has been required of ATE projects and centers since the program began in 1993. Many evaluations were concerned more with numbers...

None | Newsletter
2013

ATE Sustainability

Sustainability is about ensuring that at least some aspects of a project or center’s work—such as faculty positions, partnerships, or curricula—have “a...

None | Newsletter
2013

Do you have a model for writing up survey results?

There is not a one-size-fits-all template for writing up survey results—it depends in the survey’s scale, the reason it was conducted, and...

None | Newsletter
2013

The ATE Survey: Telling the ATE Story Since 2000

For the past 14 of the ATE program’s 20 years, an annual survey has documented the activities and accomplishments of ATE projects...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.