None | Newsletter
2014
Annual NSF Report and the Annual ATE Survey
A common question EvaluATE has been asked about the ATE survey (conducted annually since 2000, with an average response rate of 95...
Showing 641 Results
None | Newsletter
2014
The PI Guide to Working with Evaluators
(originally published as blog at ltd.edc.org/strong-pievaluator-partnerships-users-guide on January 10, 2013) Evaluation can be a daunting task for PIs. It can seem like the...
None | Newsletter
2013
2014 Winter
File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Corey Smith, Gordon Snyder, Jane Ostrander, Jason Burkhardt, Leslie Goodyear, Lori Wingate, Marilyn...
None | Miscellaneous
2013
Questions, Data, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Connecting the Dots for an Effective Evaluation- Handout
Management | Webinar
2013
Questions, Data, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Connecting the Dots for an Effective Evaluation
This webinar is intended for evaluators who are launching new evaluations or seeking to strengthen the overall design of ongoing studies. We’ll...
Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Interpretation | Slides
2013
ATE PI 2013- PreConference: Strategies for Meaningful Interpretation of ATE Evaluation Data
None | Newsletter
2013
20 Years of ATE Evaluation
Evaluation has been required of ATE projects and centers since the program began in 1993. Many evaluations were concerned more with numbers...
None | Newsletter
2013
ATE Sustainability
Sustainability is about ensuring that at least some aspects of a project or center’s work—such as faculty positions, partnerships, or curricula—have “a...
None | Newsletter
2013
Do you have a model for writing up survey results?
There is not a one-size-fits-all template for writing up survey results—it depends in the survey’s scale, the reason it was conducted, and...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.