Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 620 Results
Showing 620 Results
None | Newsletter
2014

Expectations to Change (E2C): A Process to Promote the Use of Evaluation for Project Improvement

How can we make sure evaluation findings are used to improve projects? This is a question on the minds of evaluators, project...

None | Newsletter
2014

Formative Evaluation

The most common purposes, or intended uses of evaluations, are often described by the terms formative evaluation and summative evaluation. Formative evaluation...

None | Newsletter
2014

What do you do when your evaluator disagrees with a recommendation by your program officer?

This was a question submitted anonymously to EvaluATE by an ATE principal investigator (PI), so I do not know the specific nature...

None | Newsletter
2014

Stakeholder Engagement: What Does it Mean for Your Project?

Who are the stakeholders in your project evaluation? How should they be engaged in the evaluation?  An evaluation stakeholder is anyone who...

None | Newsletter
2014

The Power of Evaluator and PI Collaboration

The PI of an ATE center or project has the responsibility of keeping a strong communication flow with the evaluator. This begins even...

None | Newsletter
2014

2014 Spring

File: Click Here Type: Newsletter Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Adrienne Adams, Elaine Johnson, Lori Wingate

Management | Webinar
2014

Right-sizing Evaluation for ATE Small Grants

When developing evaluation plans for NSF ATE projects, one size doesn’t fit all. How can meaningful evaluation plans be developed for “Small...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.