None | Newsletter
2015
Secondary Data
Secondary data is data that is repurposed from its original use, typically collected by a different entity. This is different from primary...
Showing 620 Results
None | Newsletter
2015
Can the ATE Survey Data be Used for Benchmarking?
Benchmarking is a process for comparing your organization’s activities and achievements with those of other organizations. In the business world, benchmarking emphasizes...
None | Newsletter
2015
Secondary Data Resources
It’s easier than ever to access national-level data that may be useful to ATE projects and centers for planning, benchmarking, or evaluation....
None | Newsletter
2015
How Do You Know if Your Program is Meeting Industry Needs?
Since the core of the ATE program is to prepare a technical workforce, it is critical to match the skills that students...
Data Collection & Analysis, Planning and Design | Blog Post
2014
Evaluating ATE Efforts Using Peer-Generated Surveys
During the course of evaluating the sustainability of NSF’s Advanced Technological Education program, I introduced a new method for creating evaluation surveys....
Planning and Design | Blog Post
2014
Evaluating Impact: How I Moved From Pipeline to Interstate
John Sener of Sener Knowledge LLC, an external evaluator for over a dozen ATE and other NSF grants over the past eight...
Planning and Design | Checklist
2014
Overview of the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development
This is a graphic overview of the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development created in 2014.
Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Management | External Resource
2014
Engineering Technology Pathways through High Schools, Community Colleges, and Industry Partners
This booklet contains summary findings from an evaluation of PathTech.
Management | Webinar
2014
High-Impact, Low-Cost Evaluation for Small Projects
“Small Grants for Institutions New to the ATE Program” is a funding track specifically designed for community colleges that have not had...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.