A conversation with Sharon Gusky, an ATE PI at Northwestern Connecticut Community College. Q: Your ATE project started just over a year...
This 2018 guide is a visual of what counts as independent for evaluators.
NSF’s Intellectual Merit criterion is about advancing knowledge and understanding within a given field or across fields. Publication in peer-reviewed journals provides...
This was a question submitted anonymously to EvaluATE by an ATE principal investigator (PI), so I do not know the specific nature...
1) Are there any unexpected findings in the report? The EvaluATE team has been surprised to learn that we are attracting a...
This is Peter Saflund’s evaluation challenges handout from the 2011 ATE PI Conference Pre-Conference workshop.
NSF requires evaluation, in part, because it is an essential tool for project improvement. Yet all too often, evaluation results are not...
Along with the change from FastLane to Research.gov, there are a few changes in the reporting categories. Additionally, public Project Outcomes Reports...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 
