None | Newsletter
2016
2016 Winter
This is the pdf version of our Winter 2016 Newsletter. This issue is focused on proposal development. File: Click Here Type: Newsletter...
Showing 116 Results
None | Newsletter
2015
Shorten the Evaluation Learning Curve: Avoid These Common Pitfalls
This EvaluATE newsletter issue is focused on getting started with evaluation. It’s oriented to new ATE principal investigators who are getting their...
None | Newsletter
2015
Survey Says Fall 2015
The ATE program supported nearly 1,300 programs at 2-year colleges and secondary schools across the country in 2014. The full report of...
None | Newsletter
2015
Collaborative Evaluation
A collaborative evaluation is one “in which there is a significant degree of collaboration or cooperation between evaluators and stakeholders in planning...
None | Newsletter
2015
How can you make sure your evaluation meets the needs of multiple stakeholders?
We talk a lot about “stakeholders” in evaluation. These are the folks who are involved in, affected by, or simply interested in...
None | Newsletter
2015
Creating an Evaluation Scope of Work
One of the most common requests we get at EvaluATE is for examples of independent contractor agreements and scope of work statements...
None | Newsletter
2015
Project Spotlight: Manufacturing Associate Degree Education in Northwestern Connecticut
A conversation with Sharon Gusky, an ATE PI at Northwestern Connecticut Community College. Q: Your ATE project started just over a year...
None | Newsletter
2015
2015 Fall
This is the pdf version of our Fall 2015 Newsletter. This issue is focused on getting started with evaluation, specifically for new...
None | Newsletter
2015
2015 Summer
This is the pdf version of our Summer 2015 Newsletter File: Click Here Category: Newsletter PDFs Author(s): Corey Smith, Emma Perk, Lori...
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.