multicolored rope intertwined

Through participation in EvaluATE’s professional development offerings, we have both experienced moments that reshaped how we think about evaluation practice and the skills needed to support successful projects. One lesson that continues to resonate is how naturally Agile project management aligns with evaluation work—and how incorporating Agile approaches can strengthen evaluation practice itself.

Evaluation rarely unfolds in a perfectly linear way. Timelines shift, stakeholder needs evolve, data collection challenges emerge, and new insights often require evaluators to revisit assumptions or adjust their approaches in real time. Yet evaluation is often treated as separate from the day-to-day management of a project, entering primarily at specific milestones or at the end to assess outcomes and lessons learned.

But what if evaluation were approached more adaptively from the beginning?

Traditional project management approaches often follow structured, sequential phases where planning, implementation, and assessment occur separately. Agile project management emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, continuous feedback, and adaptation throughout the life of a project. Rather than treating planning, implementation, and reflection as isolated stages, Agile encourages teams to revisit decisions regularly, incorporate feedback, and adjust approaches as new information emerges.

This alignment matters because evaluators are often required to respond to shifting timelines, evolving stakeholder needs, implementation challenges, and emerging findings in real time. In many ways, evaluators already work within Agile environments—even if they do not formally describe them that way.

Evaluation depends heavily on stakeholder engagement, ongoing communication, iterative reflection, and the ability to respond thoughtfully to changing conditions. Agile approaches strengthen these practices by creating intentional feedback loops and encouraging continuous adaptation throughout the project lifecycle.

Using an Integrated Evaluation–Agile PM Approach can strengthen evaluation practice in several ways:
● Regular stakeholder feedback loops help evaluators remain responsive to project needs;
● Continuous reflection alongside the stakeholders creates opportunities to refine data collection and interpretation strategies as projects evolve;
● Consistent communication and documentation improve transparency, strengthen relationships, and increase the likelihood that findings will be understood and used; and
● Agile approaches help evaluators remain focused not only on measuring outcomes, but also on learning throughout the process.

Putting Agile Evaluation into Practice
For evaluators, incorporating Agile approaches into practice can be both simple and practical. This may include
● holding regular check-ins or standing meetings with clients and stakeholders,
● revisiting evaluation questions and data collection plans as projects evolve,
● building continuous feedback loops into implementation,
● documenting project changes and key decisions in real time,
● and creating intentional opportunities for reflection throughout the project lifecycle.

In our own work, we have utilized different aspects of Agile project management to strengthen communication, organization, adaptability, and continuous learning throughout the evaluation process. For instance, J.R. has found project management tools such as ClickUp and Notion especially useful for organizing communication, documentation, timelines, and ongoing project adjustments. For Pamela, obtaining the Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM) credential provided a foundational understanding of project management principles and reinforced how Agile approaches—particularly adaptability, stakeholder communication, and iterative reflection—can strengthen evaluation practice in meaningful ways.

Returning to the lessons that shaped our reflections, several ideas continue to resonate with us: building strong bridges, developing agile skills, drawing on prior experiences, and remaining responsive as projects evolve. Together, these lessons highlight how incorporating Agile project management approaches into evaluation practice can strengthen communication, continuous learning, adaptability, and the meaningful use of findings.

About the Authors

Pamela Leggett-Robinson, PhD, CAPM

Pamela Leggett-Robinson, PhD, CAPM

Founder & Executive Director, PLR Consulting, Inc.

Pamela M. Leggett-Robinson, Ph.D., CAPM, ICF ACC, is the Founder and Executive Director of PLR Consulting, Inc., a boutique consulting firm based in Atlanta, GA. With 20+ years of experience as a STEM education leader, program evaluator, and chemistry scholar, she brings a distinguished record of driving high-impact initiatives that strengthen institutional effectiveness and advance the STEM workforce. Dr. Leggett-Robinson partners with organizations, educational institutions, and individuals through program evaluation, evidence-based coaching, and project management to identify participation gaps, translate data into actionable insights, and build evidence-based solutions that produce measurable organizational impact. Her evaluation practice spans multiple NSF-funded portfolios, including ATE, IUSE, S-STEM, RCN, and Alliance projects, and is grounded in mixed-methods approaches that illuminate both program outcomes and broader project significance. She is known for bringing practicality and adaptability to complex evaluation contexts, building genuine partnerships with clients and project teams that make the work feel less like oversight and more like shared problem-solving. Dr. Leggett-Robinson holds a Ph.D. in Physical Organic Chemistry from Georgia State University, a GSEC Certificate in Evidence-Based Coaching, and holds credentials as an ICF Associate Certified Coach (ACC) and Certified Associate in Project Management (CAPM).

J.R. Moller, PhD

J.R. Moller, PhD

Research and Evaluation Consultant, EvalGeek

Dr. J.R. Moller is an evaluator and researcher whose practice is grounded in Culturally Responsive Evaluation. She has over 15 years of applied program evaluation experience, with an emphasis on STEM initiatives. Her work focuses on designing and implementing evaluations that are rigorous, equity-centered, and genuinely useful to the programs and communities they serve. She holds a doctorate in Educational Research Methodology with a concentration in Program Evaluation and currently is Staff Director at High Point University, engaging in survey research and teaching research methods. She works as an independent evaluator and research consultant for EvalGeek.

Creative Commons

Except where noted, all content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Related Blog Posts

National Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.