Showing 145-152 of 158 Results
Sort By

Questions, Data, Conclusions, and Recommendations: Connecting the Dots for an Effective Evaluation
2013

This webinar is intended for evaluators who are launching new evaluations or seeking to strengthen the overall design of ongoing studies.  We’ll...

ATE Evaluation 101 (2013)
2013

In this webinar, participants will learn about the role of evaluation in ATE projects and get practical guidance on administrative/managerial aspects of...

Evaluation: A Key Ingredient for a Successful ATE Proposal
2013

Evaluation is more than a requirement for ATE proposals, it’s an essential ingredient for increasing the coherence and competitiveness of your submission....

ATE Evaluation: Measuring Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results
2012

In this webinar, participants will learn about evaluating ATE initiatives in practical, yet meaningful ways. The Kirkpatrick “Levels” model for evaluation is...

ATE Evaluation 101 (2012)
2012

In this webinar, participants will learn about the role of evaluation in ATE projects and get practical guidance on administrative/managerial aspects of...

Evaluation 101: PI “To-Do” Checklist: Before Launching your Project Evaluation
2012

This 2012 checklist created by Mentor-Connect will help ATE principal investigator's before launching their project evaluation, including a list of activities to do and to whom to engage.

E-valuation: Assessing Webinars, Social Media, and Website Usage
2011

ATE grantees are using the Web for outreach, instruction, professional development, dissemination, and more.  As the Web becomes more central to the...

Doc: Five levels of Professional Development Evaluation
2011

A handout on the five levels of professional development evaluation, presented at the 2011 ATE PI conference.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.