About the Evaluator

With over a decade of evaluation experience, six of which have been in ATE, I am not only knowledgeable about the NSF, community college, and ATE spaces, but I am committed to understanding what makes your program unique so I can best tell your story. I have experience with all sizes of ATE grants and welcome new-to-ATE clients.

Evaluation Background

I specialize in...

  • Qualitative methods
  • Quantitative methods
  • Developmental evaluation
  • Participatory evaluation approaches
  • Utilization-focused evaluation

I have worked with projects in the areas of:

  • ATE projects
  • NSF projects other than ATE (e.g., IUSE, S-STEM, AISL, HSI, ADVANCE)
  • Projects at two-year colleges
  • STEM education projects supported by funder other than NSF

Outside of Work, I enjoy...

… reading, trying new restaurants, exploring Chicago’s cultural institutions, and spending time with my friends.

A Successful Evaluation...

… is useful! Of course, it is supported by the proper methods, and it is presented in a way that makes sense to stakeholders. Ultimately, the data are understandable, and recommendations are reasonable.

My Working Style...

… is thoughtful and collaborative – I’ll ask you questions to get to the heart of what you (and the funders) want to know, gain your technical insights, and I’ll take it from there! I communicate frequently to keep you in the loop and will provide you with your data and interpretations on-time.

Evaluator Details

Education

Ph.D. and M.A. in Community Psychology from Wichita State University B.S. in Psychology and B.A. in Theatre Arts from Dominican University

Stem Discipline

Advanced Manufacturing Technologies Engineering Technologies General or Cross-cutting Advanced Technological Education Information and Securities Technologies

Location

Chicago, IL
Download Resume

Work Samples

No work samples are available at this time. Please check back later.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2332143. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.