Showing 1-7 of 7 Results
Sort By

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 6: Using Your Evaluation Results
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 5: Reporting
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 4: Data Analysis and Interpretation
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 3: Data Collection Plan
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 2: Evaluation Focus
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

Communicating a Compelling Evaluation Plan in Your ATE Proposal, Part 1: The Evaluator
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group reviewed the evaluation plans in a random sample of 169 ATE proposals across 14 years....

How ATE Proposal Evaluation Plans Have Changed Over Time: 2004–2017
2023

EvaluATE’s external evaluators at The Rucks Group examined the evaluation plan sections of 169 randomly selected ATE proposals funded between 2004 and...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.