Dear Evaluators:

March 2020 was a tough month for all of us. We—Anna Rebecca (“AR”) and I (Molly)—were working as evaluators in the science and STEM museum space. Well, until the sector-wide layoffs.

In March, we found ourselves without work. We were grieving the loss of our colleagues and work friends, but, to be completely honest, we also felt a sense of relief. This is because we were extremely burned out. And it wasn’t until we were given the gift of quiet reflection and healing that we recognized this relief stemmed from our departure from the nonprofit sector’s biggest problem: its white-dominant and white supremacy culture problem. (That link defines “white supremacy culture” in a particular way that encompasses more than you may realize. Read more about what we mean in this article specific to the museum sector. And, white women, read this article.)

Speaking for myself, I didn’t learn this language until right before my departure from my museum job. I had recognized the signs of toxicity within my organization and even brought them up with leadership. I shared my concerns about my well-being and my colleagues’ well-being, as well as the museum’s. In the end, my worries and recommendations were dismissed and ignored, and I left those meetings feeling exhausted, unheard, and not valued.

That was when I knew I had to leave the museum space. I finally recognized what my friends and my partner had been telling me all along: that I couldn’t be happy there. That I couldn’t work for an organization that prefers silence and status quo, rather than recognizing its faults, apologizing, and doing what’s right.

If this story sounds familiar to any of you, that’s because this isn’t a museum problem; it is a sector-wide problem. And we as evaluators are a part of it. If you were like me, you were lost in the endless race of deadlines. Unaware that the nonprofit and program evaluation system you work within is designed to undervalue and take advantage of the communities being served (predominantly communities of color). That by not speaking up, we as evaluators are actors in the cycles of oppression that have become the status quo within the nonprofit and philanthropic sectors.

Okay, so now that the problem is laid out, what’s the solution? Well, there isn’t one clear solution. The only way to truly create change is to tear down our current system (yes, abolishment) and rebuild it using a framework based on social justice, equity, and community-centrism. And we think using the ten principles of Community-Centric Fundraising (CCF) is a key step to this process.

Yes, you read that right. Fundraising! AR and I are evaluators, but we both have found CCF’s ten principles (see Figure 1) to be instrumental in building more racial equity and social justice into our evaluation practice.

Figure 1: Community-Centric Fundraising’s 10 Principles (


We know many people feel ready to talk about how our current status quo needs to change. And we believe CCF has the resources to help evaluators reflect bravely and converse openly about how we can change our practices for the better.

What we ask of you:

  1. Visit Community Centric Fundraising’s website.
  2. Join the CCF Slack Community and find the #evaluation channel that’s where we are!
  3. Reflect on how you can build more community-centrism into your practice

Much love and in solidarity,

Molly O’Connor and AR Lopez

About the Authors

Molly O'Connor (she/her)

Molly O'Connor (she/her) box with arrow

Evaluator & Communication Specialist

Molly is an evaluation and communications specialist occupying Santee Dakota and Anishinaabe lands. Molly has a B.S. in biology and a M.S. in natural resource science & management with a minor in evaluation. She is also a certified Strategic Doing practitioner. Her experience includes working in the human services industry, as well as teaching and evaluating in informal K-12 STEM and outdoor education settings. Currently, using a culturally responsive framework and racial equity lens, Molly helps clients reflect on their mission, determine their goals, and measure and communicate their impact. To learn more about Molly’s work, please visit her website.

Anna Rebecca (

Anna Rebecca ("AR") Lopez (she/they) box with arrow

Evaluator, Applied Social Science Researcher, and Community Organizer

AR is an evaluator, applied social science researcher, and community organizer occupying the lands of the Coast Salish people, including the Duwamish People. They have worked in the cultural sector for over a decade, with experience as an educator in history museums and as an evaluator in informal STEM learning spaces. Establishing relationships and empowering communities is a constant theme in AR’s personal and professional practice. This can be seen in much of their community work, as a founding member of Community-Centric Fundraising, Membership Chair of the Seattle Evaluation Association, and community organizer with the Duwamish Solidarity Group. Learn more at

Creative Commons

Except where noted, all content on this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Related Blog Posts

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.